Porn sex life: Does porn harm your sexual health?

In the heat of the multiple rapes and the #MeToo returns an old debate, that of the influence of Porn sex life. And young feminists have resumed the battle that Catharine McKinnon, Andrea Dworkin, and others fought more than thirty years ago. Those fell defeated by the queens of silicon and the laws of supply and demand, but also, from the intellectual level, were refuted by the thin or thick criticism of personalities as disparate as Christina Hoff Sommers, JM Coetzee or Camile Paglia.

That debate was born dead and possibly the current one is repeating the same mistakes. The polarization for or against the pornography of the eighties was fought between abolitionists or prohibitionists and liberals, and I am currently reading many texts that go exactly the same way. If the dilemma of Porn sex life is whether porn should be allowed or abolished, we will get bogged down in a miserable debate about freedom of expression. In which, naturally, vice and the market will have the upper hand. Continue reading: Different kinds of Spa

Porn sex life: How it affects us?

Porn sex life

Freixas was not demanding any kind of censorship but reflecting on the appearance that the myth of Lolita had adopted.

I think lately that one of the great problems of contemporary cultural debates is that they are almost always dragged into polarized positions in which antagonistic positions are assumed en bloc, and therefore it costs horrors to choose arguments from both sides to make a composition of place. I experienced a strange feeling during the debate that Laura Freixas and Sergio del Molino had about “Lolita” in ‘ El País ‘. To my surprise, Freixas was as convincing as the Mill.

After crossing a couple of articles in which Freixas assumed a critical position towards the reception of Lolita and the Mill stood up in defense of the literary greatness of Nabokov’s work and freedom of expression, I attended the face-to-face absolutely inclined for what Mill had to say. My surprise was that Freixas was not demanding any type of censorship, but rather reflecting on the appearance that the myth of Lolita had adopted, which was even alien to Nabokov’s intention.

With me or against me

Porn sex life

It was an enriching debate insofar as it allowed me to assimilate some concepts contrary to my principles and to know a point of view that, being so different from mine, opened me to a new terrain from which to think. The dialogue attitude of Freixas and the Mill and the moderation of Berna González-Harbor made this rare episode possible. At no time, despite Sergio’s position in defense of creative freedom, Freixas allowed him to throw himself at the side of the prohibitionists.

The debates of “with me or against me”, or the most painful ones of “with me or against the victims” are poisoned with magnetism. It happens that we end up feeling attracted to one side and end up defending more than our arguments are prepared to endure. To assume that the myth of “Lolita” has been built, in part, as a stylization of pedophilia, is perfectly compatible with a defense at all costs of the greatness of the work and even, if I hurry, the harmlessness of that myth.

A milestone in the creation of the legend

Porn sex life

In other words, to point out that a cultural aspect is problematic or that it confronts us with one of the many imperfections of the human race does not have to drag us to a prudish abolitionist or censorial campaign. You can (and should) make a sharp cultural critique that does not lead to such ridiculous and childish positions as the American college students who run to the safe space when a teacher mentions Jordan Petersen.

Which brings us back to the debate about porn, in which (unfortunately) a deterministic stance is spread that picks up the witness of Dworkin and MacKinnon and ensures that porn has a direct responsibility for the violations and therefore must be eradicated. Given this opinion, usually crowded into digital articles and gender departments of Anglo-Saxon universities, liberal feminists and non-feminists are roaring.

Is there a porn in which sex is shown as it should be?

Porn sex life

If we dodge the extremes and manage to move the debate away from the field of freedom of expression, that is, if the question is not whether or not porn should exist, if we avoid whether it should or should not be allowed, we can take advantage of a good part of the arguments of the two parties to answer honestly too much more interesting questions.

Is the easily accessible pornography of the digital age a negative influence on the sexual education of young people? Is it the only window of this generation to sex education? Is a porn in which sex is shown as it should be possible? Would it be successful, or would we approach porn to satisfy crazy fantasies? What would be the influence of porn if there were adequate counterweights in sex education? What should these counterweights be?

These are just some of the questions about Porn sex life that would flourish if the debate were to stay away from that much-used chemical reagent that drags much of the cultural discussions into a restless and sterile struggle for and against freedom of expression. You may also like: http://buzzthisnow.com/10-tips-that-you-should-keep-in-mind/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *